Back to Blog
14 min readBackend Development

Xano vs Supabase 2025: Which Backend for Your SaaS?

I've built production apps with both Xano and Supabase. Here's my honest comparison based on real projects, performance data, and client results.

Quick Comparison Table

FeatureSupabaseXano
DatabasePostgreSQLProprietary
Pricing$0-25/mo$0-85/mo
Real-timeNativeVia webhooks
AuthBuilt-in (GoTrue)Built-in
File StorageBuilt-inBuilt-in
Custom CodeSQL, Edge FunctionsJavaScript
Open SourceYesNo
Self-hostingYesNo

Supabase: When to Choose It

Real-time Applications

Chat apps, collaborative tools, live dashboards—Supabase Realtime is unbeatable.

PostgreSQL Expertise

If you know SQL, you'll be productive immediately. Full PostgreSQL power.

Cost-Conscious Projects

Free tier is generous. Pro plan at $25/mo handles 100K+ users.

Xano: When to Choose It

Visual API Builder

Non-developers can build complex APIs with visual workflow editor.

JavaScript Over SQL

If your team knows JS but not SQL, Xano is easier to learn.

Managed Everything

Zero infrastructure work. Xano handles all scaling, backups, security.

My Real Projects

Supabase Project

B2B SaaS dashboard with real-time collaboration

  • • 5,000 users
  • • 50ms avg query time
  • • $25/mo cost
  • • Built in 6 weeks

Xano Project

Mobile app backend with complex business logic

  • • 2,000 users
  • • 80ms avg response
  • • $85/mo cost
  • • Built in 3 weeks

My Recommendation

Choose Supabase if: You need real-time features, want PostgreSQL power, have SQL skills, or need the most cost-effective solution.

Choose Xano if: You prefer visual development, your team knows JavaScript better than SQL, or you want zero infrastructure management.

Need Help Choosing?

As an expert in both Xano and Supabase, I help clients choose the right backend and build scalable, production-ready applications.

Get Expert Consultation →